– QS Rankings are more effective for students and employers focused on employability, reputation, and internationalization.
– THE Rankings are more effective for academics, researchers, and policymakers focused on research output, citations, and academic excellence.
The QS World University Rankings and the Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings are two of the most influential global university ranking systems. Both aim to evaluate and compare universities worldwide, but they differ in their methodologies, focus areas, and outcomes. Below is a comparison of their efficacy based on key factors:
—
### 1. Methodology
– QS Rankings:
– Weighting:
– Academic Reputation (40%)
– Employer Reputation (10%)
– Faculty/Student Ratio (20%)
– Citations per Faculty (20%)
– International Faculty Ratio (5%)
– International Student Ratio (5%)
– Focus: QS places a heavy emphasis on academic and employer reputation, which is based on surveys. It also considers internationalization and teaching quality (via faculty/student ratio).
– Criticism: The heavy reliance on subjective survey data (50% of the score) can introduce bias and may not fully reflect objective academic performance.
– THE Rankings:
– Weighting:
– Teaching (30%)
– Research (30%)
– Citations (30%)
– International Outlook (7.5%)
– Industry Income (2.5%)
– Focus: THE emphasizes a balance between teaching, research, and citations, with a strong focus on research output and impact. It uses a broader range of performance indicators.
– Criticism: The heavy weighting on citations (30%) can favor universities in sciences and medicine over those in humanities and social sciences.
—
### 2. Coverage and Scope
– QS Rankings:
– Evaluates over 1,500 universities globally.
– Publishes regional rankings (e.g., QS Asia University Rankings) and subject-specific rankings.
– Known for its focus on employability and internationalization.
– THE Rankings:
– Evaluates around 1,900 universities globally.
– Also publishes regional and subject-specific rankings (e.g., THE Asia University Rankings, THE World University Rankings by Subject).
– Known for its focus on research excellence and academic impact.
—
### 3. Reputation and Perception
– QS Rankings:
– Highly regarded for its employer reputation metric, making it popular among students and employers.
– Often criticized for its over-reliance on subjective survey data, which can skew results.
– THE Rankings:
– Considered more academically rigorous due to its balanced approach and emphasis on research and citations.
– Widely used by governments and institutions for policy-making and benchmarking.
—
### 4. Regional and Subject Bias
– QS Rankings:
– Tends to favor English-speaking universities due to its reliance on reputation surveys, which may underrepresent non-English-speaking institutions.
– Strong focus on employability makes it popular among students but less useful for purely academic comparisons.
– THE Rankings:
– Less biased toward English-speaking institutions due to its focus on research output and citations.
– However, the emphasis on citations can still favor universities in STEM fields over humanities and social sciences.
—
### 5. Use Cases
– QS Rankings:
– Ideal for students prioritizing employability and international exposure.
– Useful for employers looking to recruit graduates from globally recognized institutions.
– THE Rankings:
– Better suited for academics and researchers looking to assess research quality and institutional performance.
– Often used by universities and governments for strategic planning and funding decisions.
—
### 6. Criticisms and Limitations
– QS Rankings:
– Over-reliance on subjective data (reputation surveys).
– Limited emphasis on research output compared to THE.
– THE Rankings:
– Citation metrics can disadvantage universities in non-STEM fields.
– Less focus on teaching quality compared to QS.
—
### Conclusion: Efficacy
– QS Rankings are more effective for students and employers focused on employability, reputation, and internationalization.
– THE Rankings are more effective for academics, researchers, and policymakers focused on research output, citations, and academic excellence.
Ultimately, the choice between QS and THE depends on the specific needs and priorities of the user. Both rankings have their strengths and limitations, and they are often used complementarily to provide a more comprehensive view of university performance.
